.

Student Allegedly Under Influence of Narcotic at High School

The minor was also reportedly in possession of the narcotic at school, according to police.

Ptl. Matthew Meyler and Ptl. Michael Hoppock of the Manalapan Police Department responded to Manalapan High School at around noon on Sept. 6 because a minor allegedly was in possession of a narcotic.

Upon investigation, Meyler and Hoppock discovered that the sophomore student was under the influence of and also in possession of a narcotic. The suspect, a 15-year-old male, was arrested and later released to the custody of his aunt. 

A later court appearance will be required, according to police.

Curious George September 18, 2012 at 02:01 PM
The same goes for the FRHSD board meetings....It seems like every meeting is an impending train wreck coming from different directions....usually from the members themselves.
Ann Alexandersen Scafidi September 18, 2012 at 02:04 PM
Manalapan HS has had a problem with drugs for at least 10 years it was Ranked #2 in the STATE FOR DRUGS . Maybe the parents should have taking an interest in what and who their children are doing instead of giving them everything the kids want.
John Jay September 18, 2012 at 02:17 PM
Ann Alexandersen Scafidi -- Just have the police drug-sniffing dogs go for a walk down the halls. ID the lockers with the dope -- get the students with the lockers down there for the search -- as the police search their lockers, the druggie students will crack as soon as the drugs are found. As they drag the druggie students out in handcuffs for all the other students to see, perhaps future drug use and dealing will drop.
fritz katz September 18, 2012 at 07:21 PM
Yeah, John Jay, I look forward to the Police State that facists like you are bringing us.
John Jay September 18, 2012 at 07:46 PM
Fritz Katz -- You don't even know what a facist IS, let alone accuse me of being one. While its been long-debated, the term "facist" more aptly applies to the state and business interests merging into an authorative system. It's more apt for ECONOMICS than what constitutes a 4th Amendment-based search. Conducting a non-invasive search of a public school facility, and not the actual students certainly doesn't constitute a 4th Amendment violation. The only time the dog would react would be if it smells something. So, if a dog "smells" drugs in a locker, having the student come down to open it doesn't constitute an illegal search either -- the dog's "nose" detects the probable cause. Is it not less invasive to have a drug dog do a walk where the druggies are than force students to drug screenings like they do to athletes? (I am against such tests, by the way. There should be probable cause to take fluids from a human). It's also much better than having things like metal detectors and officers searching students as they enter school -- now that is a police state. So I really reject your claims about using a drug dog as being something from a police state. It's not the students that are being searched, it's the facility -- that's a big difference. If the locker comes up dirty, then the police have legal authority to conduct an investigation. Sorry, you lose.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »